Sunday, 7 February 2016

The Olympus PEN-F - a personal narrative - part 1

Prelude

So, here I am, visiting mum and sis in KL and it's nearly Chinese New Year. I give Robin Wong a hello and he's in KL. He's kindly booked out a sample Olympus PEN-F for me to play with. We were not expecting many of his usual shooting buddies around so close to Chinese New Year but hey, great to see Amir S, Nick Wade, Bjorn, Scott Chung and several others - apologies if I am missing mentioning anyone from today.

I must say I had a whale of a time, in enjoying a new camera, in catching up with Robin, in meeting up with some old friends and new ones and in a different environment. Thanks to  all for that.

On to the PEN-F

In my opinion, the PEN-F is the most controversial camera that Olympus has launched for some time - depending on its acceptance and gaining market share, it may be the start of a new line. Why is it controversial? Here's my read. There are two camps of Olympus Micro Four Thirds owners.
  1. Olympus through the early PEN series - has previously offered a small, relatively lower cost series, with no Electronic Viewfinder (EVF). Old time owners like me (E-PL1, E-PM2) have got used to effective but not outrageously expensive camera bodies.
  2. Through the OM-D series, Olympus has garnered a host of DSLR and SLR migrators - those who are possessed with almost obsessive compulsions to speak about Image Quality, Weather Resistance, Fastest Auto Focus Speed, High Dynamic Range, Low Noise at High ISO - all those parameters that can be typed into a comparison matrix and debated noisily on the web, ad infinitum. 
A photo posted by Ananda Sim (@anandasim) on


What does the PEN-F bring to the table? It adds a built-in EVF, a brand new sensor, classy body finish, a tilt and flip screen, a richness of dials and exquisite JPEG controls to a PEN body. In so doing, it has classed the PEN range into the OM-D features and price range. Gasps - from both camps. 


  • Would a traditional PEN owner buy a PEN-F? 
  • Would a traditional OM-D owner buy a PEN-F?
  • Would a fresh casual purchaser buy a PEN-F?
  • Would a camera enthusiast buy a PEN-F?
  • Could a Fuji X purchaser be diverted into the PEN-F?
  • Would a Samsung buyer, seek solace in the PEN-F?

I don't  know. I don't represent any block of people. I can only say what I like. And don't.

What I liked

I've been an Olympus enthusiast. Through the E-330, E-510, E-620, E-PL1, E-PM2, E-M1. Along the way, I've picked up the Panasonic G2, GF-3. All the same sensor size. It would be nice if I could have eaten the last biscuit to get the tummy full than having had to pay for and munch through the preceding biscuits, but that's life.

The PEN-F body density, weight, right thumb grip feel really nice in the my hand. Robin cheerfully likes his PEN E-P5 - it is not festooned with buttons and dials like come up against your fingers. I do agree with that observation, But I thoroughly enjoyed the PEN-F today. I used it for several hours mounted with an Olympus 75mm, 17mm, Panasonic 14mm, 20mm and even a Samyang 7.5mm fish.

The actuation of the shutter, the sound and the dampened tumble inside is quite unlike my OM-D E-M1 - if it's one thing that give me happiness endorphins, that is it. Robin and friends say the shutter is similar to the OM-D E-M5 Mark 2 - I don't remember that rush of happiness but this PEN-F just does it for me. No, it's not better than sex.

The camera and lenses I used felt responsive. More responsive than my OM-D E-M1. I don't know why I felt that, but I did. Sure, I had my share of duds - motion blur, focus misses. I was shooting quickly in unfamiliar surroundings, with a new body, that's sure to happen. It's way ahead of my PEN E-PM2 experience (I've used that for more than 2 years). Even the normally slow autofocus Panasonic 20mm Mark 1 felt much better on this body.

The LCD screen is clear and displays nice tonality for the monochrome and colour images. The EVF is very, very good - I wear multi-focals and still have near reading difficulties but I enjoyed this EVF a lot. With the position of the EVF off centre, I tried the two eyes open technique - right eye on the EVF and left eye open to overview the scene. I was amazed at my brain being able to process the visuals for the 75mm and the Samyang fish. In the brief time, I could not make my brain handle the 14mm, 17mm, 20mm well enough to use the two eye technique. The EVF is very responsive.

I have got used to the "dirty nappy" technique with the PEN E-PM2 for more than 2 years. So much so, when I shoot my OM-D E-M1, I sometimes do that as well. Until today, I felt that putting eye to EVF for impromptu street shots of people looking at me a bit disconcerting. I felt braver with the PEN-F and enjoyed the eye to EVF method.

The controversial and sometimes ridiculed protruding button on the front right of the camera? That one? I was anticipating, from preceding comments and opinions, that it would  bug me, abrade my finger. Most of the time, it didn't. Somehow my hand adjusted how I gripped the camera, maybe the back thumb grip helped.

The little lever to adjust JPEG shadow, highlight, midtone curves, vignette, colour strengths? I thought that interface was very well done.

What I liked less or didn't like

On the OM-D E-M1, I really wanted the twist flip mechanism for the LCD that the Olympus E-620 and the Panasonic G-2 implemented. It really suits the versatility of that DSLR-like body. But the E-M1 doesn't have it. It has a simple hinged LCD. The PEN-F has this versatile twist flip. I really wish it didn't. For people photos and street photos, the simple hinge is way more appropriate. The twist flip is just clumsy. I couldn't do the "dirty nappy" much. Sigh.

Although, I really like the PEN-F, the price is a hurdle that I have to take a couple of years to overcome. Yeah, I know. #GAS (Gear Acquisition Syndrome). If a camera makes you happy and want to shoot more, it's a unique camera. More than just a set of features on a comparison matrix. The PEN-F does that.

Do yourself and Olympus a favour.  Put away that comparison matrix sheet that makes you a grumpy, "But I shoot raw only" forum impassioned, fuddy duddy. Give the PEN-F a chance to make you happy.

In part 2, I share some images I made in the morning.
In part 3, I play with colours
In part 4, I muse about the quirks of design
In part 5, I play with some processing
Part 6 is my finale


Sunday, 16 August 2015

The Toshiba Air wifi connected SD Card

Preamble

It takes me a very long while to acquire something - this is the case with the Toshiba Air SD Card - it's been several generations now that modern cameras have built-in wifi and I even have one of these but finally I got myself a wifi connected card for older camera. When I shoot now, I often want the instant gratification of uploading to social networks (G+ or Instagram) soon, without waiting for the journey home. The two market leaders for this type of card is the Toshiba Air and the Eye Fi. I knew that Olympus has an association with distributing Toshiba Air cards, so when I saw much reduced prices on eBay, I took down the local dealer's address and went in person to get one.

Things didn't look good when I inserted the card into either the Olympus E-PM2 or the Panasonic GF-3 - by what I could read from the brief documentation, I expected the card to broadcast a wifi SSID so that my phone or Windows PC could see it as a wifi source.

When you insert the card into any device, the wifi access point should start broadcasting and keep broadcasting for 5 minutes if it is on autostart. However in my case it was not on autostart and was on manual. I needed to set it to autostart.

To set up the card using the computer

  • Insert the card into the the sdcard slot of the computer
  • Run the FlashAir program - it was difficult to find, I found it at this Toshiba webpage.
    • Ensure the Wireless LAN is set to automatic startup
    • Change the connection password for the card to ensure that other cameras and device don't hijack your connection or data.

FlashAir.exe menus and screens

FlashAir Main Menu

FlashAir Network Settings

FlashAir Wireless LAN Startup Menu - ensure that this is set to automatic startup otherwise the card will not broadcast the SSID

FlashAir Drive Setting

FlashAir Initialise / Change - use this to set up the card to factory defaults and write missing or deleted folders and files

More Info

The Toshiba web pages / sites that came up in Google Search were not helpful - they were either describing product from the viewpoint of a manufacturer rather than from the viewpoint of a consumer. Often there were redirects to missing pages or pages written in Japanese. I finally found a Toshiba Singapore webpage that seemed readable. The details eluded me until I found a briefly written pdf hosted on an Olympus website. The document describes both the set up procedure using the FlashAir.exe computer program or the Flash Air mobile device app.

Here's what I discovered.

  1. The SD card appears to the camera or the computer (with SD Card slot) as a storage device.
  2. Certain folders and files are precious and should not be erased or formatted out during file deletion or formatting either in the camera or the computer. If these folders / files are deleted, you need to run FlashAir.exe (or in my case, FlashAir_v3.exe) - available in Windows or Mac variant, to replace these files on the inserted SD Card.
  3. Take care not to eject the SD Card without using the Windows Safely Remove procedure otherwise the special folders or file might be damaged by file system corruption. Of course they can be replaced by a card format but it's just more work.
The files and folders are in this structure


+---MISC
+---PRIVATE
|   |   FILEINFO.TBL
|   |   CACHE.DAT
|   \---AVCHD
|       +---BDMV
|       |   |   INDEX.BDM
|       |   |   MOVIEOBJ.BDM
|       |   |
|       |   +---PLAYLIST
|       |   +---CLIPINF
|       |   \---STREAM
|       \---AVCHDTN
|               THUMB.TID
|               THUMB.TDT
|
+---GUPIXINF
|   \---CARDICON
|          ICON_128.PNG|          ICON_32.PNG|          ICONINF.TXT
+---SD_WAN
|       CONFIG   
\---DCIM
    +---100__TSB
           FA000001.JPG


\DCIM\100__TSB\FA000001.JPG is an important static file that acts as a flag
Do not delete the folder and file, or you will be unable to change the automatic-manual operation for wireless LAN functionality. 
\SD_WAN\CONFIG is a vital text file containing settings

CONFIG contains text pairs like this:

[Vendor]

CIPATH=/DCIM/100__TSB/FA000001.JPG
APPMODE=4
APPNETWORKKEY=*******
VERSION=FA9CAW3AW3.00.00
CID=long hex code
PRODUCT=FlashAir
VENDOR=TOSHIBA
LOCK=1
APPSSID=yourssid
WEBDAV=1
TIMEZONE=40
APPAUTOTIME=300000
DNSMODE=1

Information on these parameters is available at the FlashAir Developer's website

Factory Default Settings

SSID:  flashair_xxxxxxxxxxxx ( x represents MAC address of the Product) 
Security:  WPA2  security key: 12345678 
Encryption and authentification: WPA2-AES (access point mode) 
IP Address" 192.168.0.1 (access point mode)    

Wireless LAN functional specifications 

 Wireless LAN Standard: IEEE802.11b/g/n 
 Modulation: DSSS/CCK (1, 2, 5.5, 11 Mbps), OFDM (6 to 72.2 Mbps) 
 Wireless LAN Security: WEP, TKIP, AES (WPA/WPA2) 


Monday, 6 April 2015

Why do we have Google Plus Photos repeated on Google Drive?

We're still trying to figure out WHY they created the Google Drive entry door to Google Photos (Google+ Photos).

At the moment, I suspect the designers wanted to offer a tree structure way of accessing your images. Neither the Picasa web interface nor Google Photos nor Picasa desktop client allow you to see a tree structured organisation of your image files.

Google Photos

This webapp has some logic on
a. albums
b. images from posts not in albums
c. autobackup images from phone or computer (guess)
d. images from other sources like hangouts (guess)
e. showing only the currently chosen version (there might be more than one version)
f. properties like date/time stamp and you could choose a timeline view.

You can create virtual copies of an image file between albums.

Google Drive

1. A default hierarchy tree of folders, in year/month naming e.g. Google Photos/2015/03
2. Every image file you produced from all the sources in that month is put in that month folder.
3. You can optionally see and find image files and move / make a different additional hierarchy within that base folder without breaking your G+ text post.
4. You can move image files out of that base folder into one of your own self made folders outside of the base Google Photos folder (does this count as a delete from G+ ? Not sure.
5. You can edit any of those image files with third party photo apps in the Drive menu without affecting your G+ Photos image and G+ text post. There will be Drive multiple versioning of your image file, not just the G+ Undo version.

In other words, you can carry out Drive actions and features that G+ Photos and Picasa Web webapps lack, all without breaking your G+ text posts, except image file deletion.
.
See: